THEORY OF THE ANGELS SPONSORING THE NATIONS:
BETWEEN PHARAOH RULED
I have spoken in other occasions about the theory that countries are assigned some sort of angelic administrators who try to conduct that country the best they can, without violating human will, without running over others rights and remaining within the laws ruling the celestial orbs. (It is a difficult task).
There are also rebellious angels who antagonize with the former in the running of the country, as it also occurs in the life and conduct of a particular individual. In the same way, despite the beneficial conduction of the Holy Spirit and the angels of God over a Christian, the running of this one leaves much to be desired, this is what happens with nations. This occurs because there is an independent factor, human will, which God does not permit one or the other to violate; not even He violates it. If this occurs with Christians, what more occurs with those who are not saved, and the nations?
Although it is said here it is nothing new for me, if there was it would have been the observation referring with the main nations in history, about the apparent relationship existing between the characteristics of the nations and their patron angels.
To clarify this concept, I will create a parallel between Pharaoh ruled Egypt and communist Russia, such as was done for me, to explain it to me the first time, basing it on the following factors:
a) Property, on behalf of the government, of everything that is of value in the nation.
b) Its system was conceived and put into action by a Jew.
c) In time the system turns against the Jews.
d) The country makes enormous mortuary monuments for their rulers.
e) They try to preserve the corpse of their rulers.
f) The rulers prohibit leave of the country by its residents.
I will explain everyone one of the clauses above:
b) The one who gave the
idea that the government should own the land and livestock in
c) In the
beginning, in the time of Joseph as in the time of
Lenin, the Jews had certain advantages with the
d) The Egyptian pyramids
are an existing testimony of the monuments they made to their dead
e) The Egyptians mummified
their rulers. The mummy of Lenin
is displayed everyday in front of hundreds of
f) Pharaoh prohibited the
Jews from leaving
Now there arose up
a new king over
What I want to show with everything I have said is the great similarities that exist between two regimes that could not have influenced each other because of the amount of time between the two.
This is attributed to similar patron angels or similar rebellious angels, or both, influencing the two nations, communicating to them their characteristics, or the resulting of all the characteristics.
It doesn't have to be a regime, a carbon copy of the other, because is to think that, especially the antagonist rebellious angels change their methods or ideas, when by experience realize that the first was not to their convenience. Nevertheless, it is logical that they conserve those techniques that served them to get their way, or that are the result of intense concupiscence of those rebels.
This could explain why in Ezekiel
28 it is spoken of King Tyre sometimes as if he was a human and others as
if he was an angel. It gives you the impression that it is referring
to a first class rebellious angel,
who was the one who counteracted against the angel of God in
There are other cases of historical
similarity. For example, the
cruel treatment methods and wars of the
Assyrians, their beastliness,
their efficiency in war, their
etc., seem to be traced,
copied by Hitler and the Nazi
Germany, although the first could not have influenced in the
second. The same happened in
Carthage was the image of
Tyre; they distinguished themselves because the elite of the economy
where the rulers and because their wise and technicians were foreigner attracted
by the booming economy that was enjoyed
there, like they testified in
the case of Tyre, Isaiah
23:8 and Ezekiel
27:1-25. Tyre was destroyed
by Babylonia, and its equivalent, Carthage, was destroyed by Rome, which
is equivalent to
Who hath taken this
27:1 The word of the LORD came again unto me, saying: 2 Now, thou son of man, take up a lamentation for Tyrus; 3 and say unto Tyrus: O thou that art situate at the entry of the sea, which art a merchant of the people for many isles 8 The inhabitants of Zidon and Arvad were thy mariners: thy wise men, O Tyrus, that were in thee, were thy pilots. 9 The ancients of Gebal and the wise men thereof were in thee thy calkers 10 They of Persia and of Lud and of Phut were in thine army, thy men of war 25 The ships of Tarshish did sing of thee in thy market: and thou wast replenished (Ezq 27:1-25 abbreviated)
In a certain time
in its history
Of course these similarities are not exact, and the same things do not have to happen, because we are not dealing with a programmed history, but with a conjunction of similar factors that can bring similar results, but that do not necessarily have to be this way.
I am not saying that the theory that is exposed here is unquestionably correct, but that what is here expressed has so many facts that appear to confirm it, that it is worth to consider and keep in mind. After all a theory is just that: the assumption of what is the interior dynamic of a phenomenon, based in observation and on confirmation and partial proof of its manifestations. If I could explain everything and prove everything, it would not be a theory, but a proven fact.
In a few words, the nations have angels that are in charge of them, both good and bad. Every group tries to influence the people, whether they choose to listen to one or the other, the occurrences will develop.